#Rolleiflex 2.8 c price archive
#Rolleiflex 2.8 c price code

Images from my first few rolls with my first Rolleiflex.Д«y the 1960s, the camera industry had changed radically with 35mm cameras and other medium format cameras growing in popularity, and Rolleiflex sought to diversify with 35mm cameras.

#Rolleiflex 2.8 c price code

I will always own and use a Rolleiflex!ДЇind the Rolleiflex TLR film cameras at KEH Camera with code SIWF21 for 5% off or on eBay. Though the Rolleiflex wasnвЂ™t my first medium format camera, it is without doubt my favorite. I donвЂ™t think it took me more than a roll or two of film before I knew I loved this camera style! I think I paid for the camera within the month!Д«y the end of the year, I was ready to upgrade, and I bought a Rolleiflex 2.8F. I was fortunate to have a friend with a spare Rolleiflex 3.5 MX-EVS who was willing to loan the camera to me for the summer with the option of purchasing it if I wanted to. And while I am not a street photographer like she was, I loved the look and feel of the camera, its ease of use, and the square format. I acquired my first Rolleiflex camera shortly after the phenomenon of the worldвЂ™s fascination with her work took off.

#Rolleiflex 2.8 c price archive

Besides the Hasselblad cameras, the Rolleiflex is probably the most recognizable camera in the world.ДЄnd while it has always been a popular camera, it has enjoyed a recent revival of its fame since the discovery and publishing of the Vivian Maier archive in 2011. The Rolleiflex twin lens reflex cameras are some of the most iconic cameras ever made. If you click on a link and make a purchase, Shoot It With Film may receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. OK, maybe 4 cents.This post may contain affiliate links. $500 is on the lower end of the price range for F's, and so the risks of getting a worn pro-beater increase dramatcially unless you spend at least $200-300 more for a few extra features. Avoid anything earlier than the 2.8C and avoid generally the Xenar/Tessar T models if you have other choices.

These are the best value R'flex models IMHO for they provide essentially the same basic mechanics and optics as the F model for less money, even much less money, with little loss of convenience using a handy handheld meter. For a $500 camera only budget, you can access a 2.8 or 3.5 E camera with planar or xenotar lense in Exc. Whatever model, a better condition camera will be more pleasurable to use and hold its value better. If you are prepared to spend up to $500 just for the camera, buy carefully and buy first the best mechanical, optical, cosmetic condition your budget affords. Excellent optical performance with the mechanical robustness of any Rolleiflex. If your top end is $500 for everything, stick with a late model Automat, like an MX-EVS with a Tessar or Xenar lense for $200-300. My 2 cents - What is your real budget? Is it $500 total or can you stretch for another $150-300 to include a CLA (not to mention another $100 for a lens hood and Rolleifix), which is likely necessary unless you find a camera that already has proof of a recent CLA by a reputable technician. Do check for serious problems such as dents, distortion play in the front panel and lens problems first. But you could probably get a clean, though well used C from a sensible dealer. it would not be easy to get a really nice one for $500. If you fnd a good one within your price range, buy it, and don't worry too much about which letter (I would personally avoid the 'A').

Separation can be identified before buying, and can be repaired permanently if it does occur, but it does cost to have this done.ДЄs for recommendations, it is not easly to find one in nice condition- although there are plenty of rough examples, or those that are almost really nice, but have scratched lenses, fungus in the optics etc.

The only thing that can really kill a Rollei relates to lens defects, particularly balsam separation (the material they used to use to hold two glass elements together on the Planar/Xenotar lenses). They will all will hold up another decade or two if they've made it this far, right?